PHILOSOPHY
OF ACTION RESEARCH
By,
Hanafi Pelu (181061001001)
A. Background
The idea that there are
different views of the world, and the processes that operate within it, is part
of what is known as philosophy. Philosophy is concerned with views about how the
world works and, as an academic subject, focuses, primarily, on reality,
knowledge and existence. Our individual view of the world is closely linked to
what we perceive as reality. On a day-to-day basis outside of your academic
work, it would be unusual to think often about the way you perceive reality and
the world around you. However, in relation to your dissertation, it is very
important to realize how you perceive reality. Your individual perception of
reality affects how you gain knowledge of the world, and how you act within it.
This means that your perception of reality, and how you gain knowledge, will
affect the way in which you conduct the research in your dissertation.
The origins of action
research are unclear within the literature. Authors such as Kemmis and
McTaggert (1988), Zuber-Skerrit (1992), Holter and Schwartz-Barcott (1993)
state that action research originated with Kurt Lewin, an American
psychologist. McKernan (1988 as cited in McKernan 1991) states that action
research as a method of inquiry has evolved over the last century and careful
study of the literature shows "clearly and convincingly that action
research is a root derivative of the scientific method' reaching back to the
Science in Education movement of the late nineteenth century." (McKernan
1991: 8).
McKernan (1991:8) also
states that there is evidence of the use of action research by a number of
social reformists prior to Lewin, such as Collier in 1945, Lippitt and Radke in
1946 and Corey in 1953. McTaggert (1992: 2) cites work by Gstettner and
Altricher which has a physician named Moreno using group participation in 1913
in a community development initiative with prostitutes in Vienna. Freideres
(1992:3-4) asserts that the concept of participatory research emerged in the 1970s
from development work in low income countries and mentions names such as
Fals-Borda and Freideres.
Despite the clouded
origins of action research, Kurt Lewin, in the mid-1940s constructed a theory
of action research, which described action research as "proceeding in a
spiral of steps, each of which is composed of planning, action and the
evaluation of the result of action" (Kemmis and McTaggert 1990: 8). Lewin
argued that in order to "understand and change certain social practices,
social scientists have to include practitioners from the real social world in
all phases of inquiry" (McKernan 1991: 10). This construction of action
research theory by Lewin made action research a method of acceptable inquiry.
(McKernan 1991: 9).
Movements that have had
historical and philosophical influences on action Research are:
- The
Science in Education Movement of the nineteenth and early twentieth
century in which the scientific method was applied to education, notably
in the work of Bain (1979), Boone (1904) and Buckingham (1926) (McKernan
1991: 8).
- The
Experimentalist and Progressive educational work, especially of John
Dewey, "who applied the inductive scientific method of problem
solving as a logic for the solution of problems is such fields as
aesthetics, philosophy, psychology and education" (McKernan 1991:8).
- The
Group Dynamics movement in social psychology and human relations training.
This movement was used in the nineteenth century to address the social
problems of this era through qualitative social enquiry. (McKernan 1991: 9).
It was again utilised in the 1940s to address some of the problems (such
as the onslaught of World War II, inter-group relations, racial prejudice,
and social reconstruction) being experienced at this time. One of the
noted researchers of this time was Kurt Lewin. He discussed action
research as a form of experimental inquiry based upon the groups
experiencing problems. "Lewin argued that social problems should
serve as the locus of social science research. Basic to Lewin's model is a
view of research composed of action cycles including analysis,
fact-finding, conceptualization, planning, implementation and evaluation
of action. (McKernan 1991:9) In the fifties and early sixties action
research was used in the study of industry, it developed a committed
following in the USA at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and in
the UK at the Tavistock Institute. (McKernan 1991: 10)
- Post-war
Reconstructionist Curriculum Development Activity. Action research in
education was utiliszd in this era as "a general strategy for
designing curricula and attacking complex problems, such as inter-group
relations and prejudice through large curriculum development projects
(McKernan 1991: 10). Generally the research was carried out by outside
researchers with the cooperation of teachers and schools (McKernan
1991:10). Noted researchers of this era were Corey (1953), Taba (1949) and
Brady and Robinson (1952) (McKernan 1991:10). However by the end of the
1950s action research was in decline and under attack (McKernan 1991:10).
Sanford (1970, as cited in McKernan 1991:10) suggested that the decline
was directly related to the split between science and practice which was
supported by the movement, and to the shift towards the establishment of
expert educational research and development laboratories. This shift
highlighted the separation of theory and practice Professional researchers
were insulated from the teaching ranks and were prevented from studying
problems in the field (McKernan 1991:11).
- The
teacher-researcher movement. This movement originated in the UK, with the
work of Stenhouse (1971, 1975) and the Humanities Curriculum Project.
Stenhouse felt that all teaching should be based upon research, and that
research and curriculum development were the preserve of teachers.
(McKernan 1991:11) Other significant teacher-researcher developments
include the Ford Teaching Project, and the Classroom Action Research
Network.
B. Discussion
Bogdan & Biklen
(1992: 223) explain that action research is the systematic collection of
information that is designed to bring about social change. In addition,
(Cameron-Jones: 1983) defines action research as a research carried out by
practitioners with a view to improve their professional practice and understand
it better. In accordance with that Allwright and Bailey (1991: 2) mention that
it is a research centers on the classroom, and simply tries to investigate what
actually happens inside the classroom. It treats classroom interaction as
virtually the only object worthy of investigation.
Three of the many
definitions for action research are: a "systemic inquiry that is
collective, collaborative, self-reflective, critical and undertaken by
participants in the inquiry" (McCutcheon and Jung 1990:148). "a form
of collective self-reflective inquiry undertaken by participants in social
situations in order to improve the rationality and justice of their own social
or educational practices, as well as their understanding of these practices and
the situations in which these practices are carried out" (Kemmis and
McTaggert 1990:5). "action research aims to contribute both to the
practical concerns of people in an immediate problematic situation and to the
goals of social science by joint collaboration within a mutually acceptable ethical
framework" (Rapoport 1970:499 as cited in McKernan 1991:4).
Within all these
definitions there are four basic themes: empowerment of participants;
collaboration through participation; acquisition of knowledge; and social
change. The process that the researcher goes through to achieve these themes is
a spiral of action research cycles consisting of four major phrases: planning,
acting, observing and reflecting (Zuber-Skerrit 1991:2).
Grundy and Kemmis (1981
as cited in Grundy 1988) state that there are three minimal requirements for
action research. "These requirements incorporate the goals of improvement
and involvement which characterize any action research project. The conditions
which are set out there as individually necessary and jointly sufficient for
action research to exist are:
- the
project takes as its subject-matter a social practice, regarding it as a
strategic action susceptible to improvement;
- the
project proceeds through a spiral of cycles of planning, acting, observing
and reflecting, with each of these activities being systematically and
self-critically implemented and interrelated; and
- the
project involves those responsible for the practice in each of the moments
of the activity, widening participation in the project gradually to
include others affected by the practice and maintaining collaborative
control of the process (Grundy and Kemmis 1981 as cited in Grundy
1988:353).
Action research is a
rather simple set of ideas and techniques that can introduce you to the power of systematic reflection on your
practice. Our basic assumption is
that you have within you the power to meet all the challenges of the teaching profession. Furthermore, you
can meet these challenges without wearing
yourself down to a nub. The
secret of success in the profession of teaching is to continually grow and
learn.
Action research is a
way for you to continue to grow and learn by making use of your own experiences. The only theories involved are the ideas that
you already use to make sense of
your experience. Action research literally starts where you are and will take you as far as you want
to go, (Frances Rust and Christopher
Clark, 2008: p.3)
C. Conclusion
The secret of success
in the teaching profession is to
continually grow and learn. Action research
is a way to continue to grow and learn
by making use of your own experiences.
How to use action
research in your classroom was
developed from our years of supporting teachers
in the Teachers Network Leadership Institute
to conduct action research in order
to make powerful connections among policy, practice, and student achievement.
It is what others have
learned about this topic. If you haven’t already read other research and theory
on your topic, now is the time to do it. This is critical to situating your
work. If, for example, you find that the action you took has results that are
very similar to those of other researchers, then you know your analysis is in
the ballpark. Essentially, you can borrow from the authority of others that
have come before you to strengthen the claims that you will make for the action
that you took. If, however, your results contradict prior research, then you
are well on the way to forming a provocative new question about why your study
yielded such different results.
References
Bogdan, Robert C . Biklen. Sari Knopp., 1992. Qualitative
Research for Education An Introduction To Theory and Methods. London: Allyn
and Bacon.
Frances Rust and
Christopher Clark, 2008. How
to Do Action Research in Your Classroom
Lessons from the Teachers Network Leadership Institute.
Holter, I.M., and Schwartz - Barcott,D. (1993). Action
Research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing?
Journal of Advanced Nursing 1993:128; 298-304
Kemmis,S. and McTaggert,R. (Ed). (1988). The Action
Research Reader (3 ed) Geelong: Deakin University Press.
McKernan,J., (1991). Curriculum Action Research.
A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner London:
Kogan Page
Zuber-Skerrit,O., (1992). Improving Learning and
Teaching Through Action Learning and Action Research Draft paper for the
HERDSA Conference 1992 University of Queensland.
No comments:
Post a Comment